Home EQNEED
U. S. AIRCRAFT CARRIER DEPLOYMENT HISTORY DATA BASE - Forum posting restricted.


Forum history
Board Founded By:
>>>Outsider<<<
Founded: 29 May 2006
Moved to FPB: 24 October 2006
Ownership  transferred to Batman47
1 August 2008
New OWCP forum
located>>>>HERE<<<

TheUnitedWebsitesOfAmerica

TheUnitedWebsitesOfAmerica.com

The Best Military Sites on the Internet - BestMilitarySites.com

Who is Online

In total there are 3 users online :: 0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 3 Guests

Registered Users: None

[ View complete list ]


Most users ever online was 170 on Mon Sep 28, 2009 7:09 pm


Users with a Birthday and or anniversary this month

None reported



Recent Discussions
» Ronald Reagan (CVN-76) - MSO & ? - WestPac 798th FWFD
by Batman47 on Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:37 pm

» USS Nimitz (CVN-68) - "WestPac" - 800th FWFD
by Batman47 on Fri Aug 14, 2009 9:45 pm

» USS John C. Stennis (CVN 74) - WestPac - 796TH FWFD
by Batman47 on Fri Aug 14, 2009 9:03 pm

» July 2 2009 to Present
by Batman47 on Fri Aug 14, 2009 8:25 pm

» U. S. Navy DESRON's MASTER INDEX
by Batman47 on Fri Aug 14, 2009 8:05 pm

» USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN-69) - OIF/OEF/MSO-797th FWFD
by Batman47 on Mon Jun 22, 2009 12:38 am

» USS George Washington (CVN 73) - WestPac - 799th FWFD
by Batman47 on Thu Jun 11, 2009 2:11 am

» U. S. Aircraft Carrier Status –1 January to 1 July 2009
by Batman47 on Mon May 11, 2009 10:24 pm

» Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN-69)-OEF, OIF & MSO-780th FWFD
by Batman47 on Sun May 10, 2009 3:07 am

» Theodore Roosevelt (CVN-71) - OIF, OSC & MSO-773rd FWFD
by Batman47 on Mon May 04, 2009 7:34 am

» Theodore Roosevelt (CVN-71) - OIF - 753rd FWFD
by Batman47 on Mon May 04, 2009 7:10 am

» USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN-71) - MSO / OEF - 794th FWFD
by Batman47 on Mon May 04, 2009 6:53 am

» U. S. Aircraft Carrier Status –23 Nov to 31 Dec 2008
by Batman47 on Sat Apr 25, 2009 1:27 pm

» USN/USCG High Ranking Officer Promotions 2009
by Batman47 on Mon Feb 23, 2009 11:43 pm

» SUBGRU/SUBRON/SUBDEVRON/DSRV MASTER
by Batman47 on Sat Jan 10, 2009 2:48 pm


Author Message
PATCHES
SR. Chaplain
User is Offline
SR. Chaplain


Joined: 24 Oct 2006
Posts: 12997
Karma: 16
applaud / smite

Location: Randolph, County N.C.
9216 points
0 warnings
0 tempbans

Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 5:00 pm    Post subject: Marines Fighting War of the Poppies
· Quote

May 15, 2008
Associated Press
GARMSER, Afghanistan - Marines who once planned to be in this southern Afghan town for just a few days are extending their mission by several weeks after facing an influx of Taliban fighters.

The change in plans shows that despite a record number of international troops in the country, forces are still spread thin and U.S. commanders must make tough choices about where to deploy them.

Manpower problems are acute in Helmand, the largest and probably the most dangerous province in Afghanistan, where the U.S. 24th Marine Expeditionary Unit arrived late last month to open a route to move troops to its southern reaches near the border with Pakistan.

Britain has about 7,500 soldiers in the province, but does not have enough troops to move south of Garmser, a district still largely held by the Taliban and bursting with opium poppy fields.

The 2,400-strong Marine unit met stiff resistance as they moved in. Between 100 and 400 Taliban fighters moved into the Garmser area as the poppy harvest got under way, apparently to defend their interests in the lucrative drug trade.

Maj. Tom Clinton Jr. said the Marines would be in Garmser for several more weeks. It means the Marines might not take part in an operation that was planned in another southern province this month.

"The number of fighters that stood and fought is kind of surprising to me, but obviously they're fighting for something," Clinton said, alluding to poppies. "They're flowing in, guys are going south and picking up arms. We have an opportunity to really clear them out, cripple them, so I think we're exploiting the success we're finding."

Helmand is the hub of opium production in Afghanistan, which accounts for more than 90 percent of the global supply of this raw material of heroin. The Taliban are believed to derive tens of millions of dollars from the trade.

Still, the Marines have been careful not to alienate residents by destroying the poppy fields that poor farmers rely on for income. Commanders say their goal is to rid the region of Taliban fighters so the Afghan government can move in and tackle the drug problem.

The prospects of that happening appear remote. Although thousands of acres of poppy fields are eradicated annually in Afghanistan, it is only a small fraction of the total area sown. Year after year, production has soared and security has deteriorated.

In recognition of the growing threat posed by Taliban militants, there are now almost 70,000 international soldiers in Afghanistan. The U.S. has 33,000, the most since the U.S.-led invasion in late 2001 ousted the Taliban for giving haven to al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden.

U.S. forces have mostly operated in the east of the country, rather than the south, where NATO has struggled to find nations willing to fight the increasingly bloody insurgency.

U.S. Gen. Dan McNeill, the top NATO commander in Afghanistan, has said he needs three more brigades - two for combat and one to train Afghan soldiers, roughly 7,500 to 10,000 additional soldiers.

When the Marines eventually leave Garmser, any gains the 24th has made could be quickly erased unless other forces from NATO or the Afghan government move in.

"We can't be a permanent 24/7 presence. We don't have enough men to stay here," said Staff Sgt. Darrell Penyak, 29, of Grove City, Ohio. "We would need the ANA (Afghan army) to move in, and right now the way we're fighting, there's no way the ANA can come in. They couldn't handle it."

Afghanistan's army and police forces are steadily growing, but are still not big - or skilled - enough to protect much of the country. Spokesmen for both forces said they were not aware of plans to send forces to Garmser.

Col. Nick Borton, commander of British forces in the southern part of Helmand, recently visited U.S. positions in Garmser, where he told the Americans he'd be happy if they stayed on.

"If they're here for only a short time, we can't build very much off that," he said. "Their presence for a few days doesn't really help us."

A representative of the U.S. Agency for International Development, the U.S. government aid arm, told Marine battalion commander Lt. Col. Anthony Henderson that "people lose faith if you pull out."

The next day, at a meeting of Marines and Afghan elders, the bearded, turban-wearing men told Marine Capt. Charles O'Neill that the two sides could "join together" to fight the Taliban. "When you protect us, we will be able to protect you," the leader of the elders said.

Despite uncertainties over how secure Garmser, O'Neill liked what he heard.

"We have something here we can really exploit, if we can get some Afghan national police here," he said. "The Marines can definitely do the job, but we're not a permanent presence. With their own people providing their own security they can really get something done."
_________________

Staff
Moderator
Company XO  
M.S.T. Charlie CO.

SR. Forum Chaplain

I used to ask God if He would come and help me. Then I asked if I could come and help Him.
Finally I ended by asking God to do His own work through me.
Back to top

   
All times are GMT - 3 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Topics   Replies   Author   Views   Last Post 
 •  Prayer for Amy & looserbaby29 (2 of our own) 8 Outsider 454 Mon Apr 14, 2008 12:11 am
PATCHES View latest post
 •  Ms. Clinton caught in her OWN lie 1 Outsider 249 Fri Mar 28, 2008 12:31 am
Roadie View latest post
 •  Honoring one of our own:( 29 Oneactual 1156 Wed Dec 05, 2007 6:38 pm
walts View latest post
 •  Marine Staff Sergeant Helps Awaken Anbar 0 Oneactual 1640 Sun Nov 18, 2007 8:10 pm
Oneactual View latest post
 •  What It Means To Love A Soldier 0 Amy4Pets3 251 Mon Sep 10, 2007 4:40 pm
Amy4Pets3 View latest post

EQNEED  is in no way endorsed or supported by the US government Dept. Of Defense Or ANY branch of

of the United States military.

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, any copyrighted work on this message board is being distributed under fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for non-profit research and educational or criticism purposes only. Not withstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work including such use by reproduction in copies or phono records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is NOT an infringement.




Military Topsites List

Joint operations/Link directory[Related]

Joint Ops [Non Related]
To visit these partners sites you MUST click drop down menu and select the site you wish to visit. To return to owcp you MUST click your back button on your browser

Official Government Links
To view links click drop down menu and select site you wish to visit. Will open in same window To return to owcp use your BACK button on your browser

Search

Advanced Search

Announcements
{Indicates}Older but STILL valid announcements]
{Indicates} New announcements

Click thread titles to visit these important threads
**Links will open in a new window**
Recruitment challenge!!!!
Rules & code of conduct
Forum Bashing
OPSEC
Your forum awards
Forum Ranks list
Red Fridays
Tell us how you found our site..[POLL]

AWOL? or On leave?

Passing of the torch
ATTENTION ALL troops!!!!
New fields in mini profiles]
Veterans friends.com
Military Scam!!

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

Looking for free phpbb3 hosting?